LIS201: Information, Technology, and Organizations

August 1999

This is one of two required core courses for the Information Studies Minor
offered by the
Graduate School of Library and Information Science at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

 

LIS201: Information, Technology, and Organizations

Fall 1999 Course Outline, Assignments and Weekly Schedule

Instructor: Professor Caroline Haythornthwaite (haythorn@classweb.lis.uiuc.edu)

Room 123, 501 East Daniel St.

phone: (217) 244-7453

Class: Tuesday & Thursday 2-3:15

Room 102 Lincoln Hall

Office hours: Wednesday 1-3 or by appointment

Notes: Some overheads and handouts from the classes are available; also a list of further readings.

 * New * … Final Assignment Rules

Overview

Organizations can be considered as information processing systems which strive to collect, process and disseminate information in the most efficient and effective manner. But, they can also be considered as collectives of classweb who share a common interest in achieving goals relating to the business of the organization, with information goals associated with keeping the organization going and accomplishing work. The way in which an organization is viewed provides an image that is used to design and select technologies. Depending on our view of organizations, we put priority on collecting, monitoring and controlling data, e.g., via transaction processing systems, and management information systems, or we put priority on tools that allow classweb to define the way in which they interact, e.g., via electronic mail, and computer-supported cooperative work tools.

This course explores images of organizations and how these images support or constrain the way in which organizations collect, process, and exchange information, and the way in which decisions are made about the implementation and design of information technologies. We will explore:

Evaluation

Students will be expected to complete two assignments (5 pages each) and a major research paper (10 pages). Students are expected to participate in class discussions and are responsible for providing summaries of at least one of the week's readings twice during the term.

Assignments: 2 x 20% = 40%

Major Paper: 40%

In-Class Presentations (informal) and Participation: 20%

 

Assignments

1. Y2K [5 pages, double-spaced; 1000 words] Due: Sept. 28/99 20%

As one of the hottest topics affecting organizations as we near the end of 1999, our first assignment is to explore what the Y2K issue is and its impact in organizations. Your first assignment is to find out what the issue is and to provide a summary of its origin and what is being said about the impact.

We will follow this issue all term, bringing in new information as it appears. In the assignment you are expected to show that you understand the basics of the issue so we can discuss it through the rest of the term.

Sources: Wired magazine articles, WWW, newspapers, magazines etc.

Optional: Submit the assignment as a web page

2. Music Top Ten [5 pages; double-spaced; 1000 words] Due: Oct. 26/99 20%

The ranking of a song into the music top ten affects how often it gets played on radios, etc., which in turn affects sales and success for the artist and their label. Monitoring the top ten is an important feature of the information environment of music stations on radio and television. How does this top ten get compiled? What impact does it have on what a radio or TV station plays, and on what music stores buy?

Your assignment is to explore some aspect of the music top ten – how the list is compiled (by who, based on what statistics, covering what regions, etc.), how radio or TV stations find and use this information and how important it is to their operations, or how a music store finds and used this information.

You may do this assignment in groups. You might interview a music store manager or a radio station manager and ask about how the music top ten affects their play list or ordering habits. Ask how they get the list – who from and how often. Explore how it affects the way they monitor the environment for information relevant to their business.

Optional: Submit the assignment as a web page

3. Image Paper [10 pages; double-spaced; 2000 words] Due: Dec. 7/99 40%

Using chapters from the Morgan book as a model, (1) develop an image of an organization and (2) discuss the implications of that image for the information technologies that would support it.

Optionally, (3) evaluate your image for how well it fits a real organization such as somewhere you have worked or someone you know has worked, or for the university, a library, a government office, a local business, etc.

Here are some ideas for images:

or

 

 

Course Outline and Weekly Readings

LIS 201: Organizations, Technology and Information

Text: Morgan, Images of Organization, 2nd edition

Introduction

1. Introduction to Course and IS Minor

 

Organizations and Technology

2. What are organizations? and What is technology?

Reading: Morgan, Chapter 1 (Introduction);

See also: Stohl, Chapter 1 which summarizes Morgan, and Morgan, Chapter 10 re metaphor

3. The role of information in organizations

Reading:
Nardi, B.A. & O'Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies. Chapter 4 in Information Ecologies: Using Technology with a Heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 

Y2K – the sound and the fury

4. Y2K and all that

Reading:
Ullman, E. (April, 1999). The myth of order: The real lesson of Y2K is that software operates just like any natural system. Wired, 126-129, 183-184.

Leslie, J. (April, 1999). Powerless: What happens at 00:00:01 on January 1? Wired, 118-13, 175-180., and Life in the dark. 124-5, 181-2.

 

Images of Organizations and Technologies for each Image

5. Rational View of Organizations

Organizations as rational systems

Technologies for rational information processing

Reading: Morgan, Chapter 2

 

6. Natural View of Organizations

Organizations as natural systems

Technologies for natural information processing and for group processes

Reading:
McGregor, D.M. (1957:1992). The human side of enterprise. In J.M. Shafritz & J.S. Ott (Eds.), Classics of Organization Theory (pp. 174-180). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

Grudin, J. (1989). Why groupware applications fail: Problems in design and evaluation. Office: Technology and People, 4(3), 245-264.

Suggested Further Reading:
Galegher, J. & Kraut, R.E. (1990). Technology for intellectual teamwork: Perspectives on research and design. In J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 1-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

7. Organizations and their environment

Reading: Morgan, Chapter 3

8. Organizations as information processing systems

Reading:
Morgan, Chapter 4

Galbraith, J. (1973:1992). Information processing model. In J.M. Shafritz & J.S. Ott (Eds.), Classics of Organization Theory (pp. 308-315). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

9. Decision making

Information and decision making

Meetings and meeting support technologies

Reading: Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.

10. Information in Design and Workplaces

Reading:
Becker, F. & Steele, F. (1995). Rethinking status, identity and space. Chapter 3 in Workplace by Design: Mapping the High–Performance Workscape (pp. 27-47). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Suggested Further Reading:
Erickson, T. (1993). From interface to interplace: The spatial environment as a medium for interaction. Proceedings of the conference on spatial information theory. Available at: http://www.pliant.org/personal/Tom_Erickson/Interplace.html

11. Organizations as historical entities, cultural entities, etc.

Other factors affecting rational information use in organizations

Reading: Morgan, Chapter 5

Reading discussion session on factors affecting rational information use in organizations

You will be expected to report in class on one of these papers or chapters… although I highly recommend all of them :-)

One of the following:
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-63.

Feldman, M.A. & March, J.G. (1988). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. In March, J.G., Decisions and Organizations (chapter 18, pp. 81-91). NY: Basil Blackwell.

March, J.G., & Sevon, G. (1988). Gossip, information and decision-making. In J.G. March. Decisions and Organizations, 429-442. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Yates, J. (1993). Co-evolution of information-processing technology and use: Interaction between the life insurance and tabulating industries. Business History Review, 67, 1-51.

Suggested Further Reading: Morgan, Chapter 6 and 7.

12. Impact of IT on information processes

Reading:
Perrow, C. (1984). Complexity, coupling, and catastrophe. In Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (chapter 3). New York, NY: Basic Books.

Suggested Further Reading:
Weick, K.E. (1990). Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. In P.S. Goodman, L.S. Sproull & Associates (eds.), Technology and Organizations (pp. 1-44). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

13. The productivity paradox

Reading:
Brynjolfsson, E. & Hitt, L.M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49-55.

Suggested Further Reading:
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology: Review and Assessment, Communications of the ACM, 36, 66-77.

14. Thanksgiving week

15. IT and change

Reading: Morgan, Chapter 8

Keen, P.G.W. (1991). Redesigning the organization through information technology. Planning Review, 19, 4-9.

Suggested Further Reading:
Barley, Stephen R. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (March), 61-103.

Burkhardt, M.E. & Brass, D.J. (1990). Changing patterns and patterns of change - The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. ASQ, 35(1), 104-127.

Keen, P.G.W. (1981). Information systems and organization change. Communications of the ACM, 24(1), 24-33.

Rogers, E.M (1995). Chapter 1, Diffusion of Innovations. Fourth Edition. NY: The Free Press.

16. Last week

 

Calendar for LIS201, Fall 1999

Assignments Due Dates: Sept. 28, Oct. 26, Dec. 7

 

Date

This week in IT&O

Readings

1

Aug. 26

Introduction to Course and IS Minor

 

2

31, Sept. 2

What are organizations?

What is technology?

Morgan, Chapter 1 (Introduction), Images of Organization.

see also Stohl, Chapter 1 which summarizes Morgan

3

7, 9

The role of information in organizations

Nardi, B.A. & O'Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies. Chapter 4 in Information Ecologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

4

14, 16

Y2K and all that

Ullman, E. (April, 1999). The myth of order: The real lesson of Y2K is that software operates just like any natural system. Wired, 126-129, 183-184.

Leslie, J. (April, 1999). Powerless: What happens at 00:00:01 on January 1? Wired, 118-13, 175-180. and Life in the dark. 124-5, 181-2.

5

21, 23

Organizations as rational systems;

Technologies for rational information processing

Morgan, Chapter 2

6

28, 30

Organizations as natural systems;

Technologies for natural information processing

**Y2K Assignment Due September 28 **

McGregor, D.M. (1957:1992). The human side of enterprise. In J.M. Shafritz & J.S. Ott (Eds.), Classics of Organization Theory (pp. 174-180). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

Grudin, J. (1989). Why groupware applications fail: Problems in design and evaluation. Office: Technology and People, 4(3), 245-264.

7

Oct. 5, 7

Organizations and their environment

Morgan, Chapter 3

8

12, 14

Organizations as information processing systems

Morgan, Chapter 4

Galbraith, J. (1973:1992). Information processing model. In J.M. Shafritz & J.S. Ott (Eds.), Classics of Organization Theory (pp. 308-315). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

9

19, 21

Information and decision making; Meetings and meeting support technologies

Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.

*** CAVE visits on the 18th and 21st

*** no class the 21st

*** hand in 1/2 page re your CAVE visit

10

26, 28

Information in Design and Workplaces

* walkabout *

**Top Ten Assignment Due October 26 **

Becker, F. & Steele, F. (1995). Rethinking status, identity and space. Chapter 3 in Workplace by Design: Mapping the High–Performance Workscape (pp. 27-47). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

11

Nov. 2,4

Organizations as historical entities, cultural entities

plus

Reading discussion session on factors affecting rational information use in organizations

Morgan, Chapter 5

One of the following to discuss in class:

Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-63.

Feldman, M.A. & March, J.G. (1988). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. In March, J.G., Decisions and Organizations (chapter 18). NY: Basil Blackwell.

March, J.G., & Sevon, G. (1988). Gossip, information and decision-making. In J.G. March. Decisions and Organizations, 429-442. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Yates, J. (1993). Co-evolution of information-processing technology and use: Interaction between the life insurance and tabulating industries. Business History Review, 67, 1-51.

12

9, 11

Impact of IT on information processes

Perrow, C. (1984). Complexity, coupling, and catastrophe. In Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (chapter 3). New York, NY: Basic Books.

13

16, 18

The productivity paradox

Brynjolfsson, E. & Hitt, L.M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49-55.

14

23, 25

Drop-in class

No class – Thanksgiving

15

30, Dec. 2

IT and change

Keen, P.G.W. (1991). Redesigning the organization through information technology. Planning Review, 19, 4-9.

16

7, 9

Wrap-up

** Images Paper Due